NEW ROCHELLE CITY SD

districtWestchester County9,846 pupils$33,909/pupil

☆ Save + Add to side-by-side 📊 Board presentation

Where it lands vs peers

83.5%5th percentile

· peer median 89.9%

ELA Math Grad Absent $/Pupil

83.5%

low 78.8%high 97.6%med 89.9%

this entity

peers

peer

middle 50% (IQR)

peer median

this district

Peer group

20 peers

Chosen by

Same N/RC, ±40% enrollment · 20 districts

Edit peer group →

Trend over time —

this entity

peer median

What changed

vs. 2023–24 · biggest movers

Regents Earth Science fell 47.0 pts to 15.0% (from 62.0%)
Regents Living Environment fell 33.0 pts to 30.0% (from 63.0%)
NYSAA Proficiency — Science (Grade 8) fell 21.0 pts to 67.0% (from 88.0%)
NYSAA Proficiency — Math (Grade 4) fell 18.0 pts to 82.0% (from 100.0%)

Special population gaps — Grad 4-yr

vs. All Students · 2024–25

Each subgroup against the All-Students value, widest gaps first. Blue ▲ favors the subgroup; amber ▼ is a gap to close. The last column shows the typical gap among your peer group.

Subgroup	Grad 4-yr	Gap vs All	vs. peer-typical gap
English Language Learner	55.1%	−28.4 pts	−32.6 pts · 4.2 pts narrower than peers
Students with Disabilities	63.0%	−20.5 pts	−17.6 pts · 2.9 pts wider than peers
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander	97.3%	+13.8 pts	+4.9 pts · 8.9 pts wider than peers
Black or African American	88.0%	+4.5 pts	−4.0 pts · in line with peers
Hispanic or Latino	79.7%	−3.8 pts	−5.3 pts · 1.5 pts narrower than peers
Economically Disadvantaged	81.7%	−1.8 pts	−4.5 pts · 2.7 pts narrower than peers
White	84.0%	+0.5 pts	+2.6 pts · 2.1 pts narrower than peers

Gap vs. All Students over time — Grad 4-yr

Each subgroup's gap vs. All Students, by year (points). Amber = the subgroup is behind · blue = ahead · grey = no data.

	2017–18	2018–19	2019–20	2020–21	2021–22	2022–23	2023–24	2024–25
English Language Learner	—	—	—	−32.2	−23.3	−28.0	−33.0	−28.4
Students with Disabilities	−24.6	−19.5	−15.2	−28.3	−24.2	−18.5	−20.5	−20.5
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander	+17.3	+4.9	+5.8	+11.5	+11.0	+8.1	+17.0	+13.8
Black or African American	+1.6	+1.1	+1.5	+4.2	+1.8	+7.2	+1.8	+4.5
Hispanic or Latino	−8.1	−8.5	−7.2	−7.2	−3.0	−2.7	−4.4	−3.8
Economically Disadvantaged	−3.1	−5.4	−3.7	−3.5	−4.2	−0.3	−3.1	−1.8
White	+9.4	+11.4	+10.8	+7.1	+2.2	−1.7	+4.4	+0.5
English Language Learners	−52.4	−35.0	−38.8	—	—	—	—	—

amber = behind → blue = ahead · grey = no data no data

Enrollment & demographics

9,686 students · 2024–25

Total enrollment

10,60217

10,67218

10,40419

10,28620

9,95221

9,72622

9,71223

9,64824

9,68625

Race & ethnicity

Hispanic or Latino5,270 · 54.4%

White1,988 · 20.5%

Black or African American1,785 · 18.4%

Asian or Pacific Islander376 · 3.9%

Multiracial252 · 2.6%

American Indian or Alaska Native15 · 0.2%

Gender

Male4,995 · 51.6%

Female4,688 · 48.4%

Non-Binary⚠

Subgroups (share of enrollment)

Economically Disadvantaged5,898 · 60.9%

Students with Disabilities1,864 · 19.2%

English Language Learners1,158 · 12.0%

Advanced coursework (AP/IB)

2023–24 · latest available

AP/IB pass rate

68.5%

scored 3+ (AP) / 4+ (IB)

Exams per 100 students

14.9

all grades

Subjects taken

AP 1433 · IB — exams

Most-taken exams

AP World History (AP) · 187 exams · 64.7% pass
AP US History (AP) · 166 exams · 78.9% pass
AP Language and Comp (AP) · 146 exams · 69.2% pass
AP Computer Science Principles (AP) · 88 exams · 60.2% pass
AP Calculus AB (AP) · 77 exams · 75.3% pass

Report card vs. 20 peers

Subgroup: All Students · 2024–25

Grades 3–8

75th pct

52.0%▲ 6.0 pt

peer median 46.0% · #6 of 21 · 3,619 tested

Grade breakdown

Grade 3	50.0%	peer 50.0%	50th
Grade 4	57.0%	peer 47.0%	80th
Grade 5	61.0%	peer 51.0%	80th
Grade 6	47.0%	peer 42.0%	70th
Grade 7	45.0%	peer 41.0%	55th
Grade 8	52.0%	peer 42.5%	75th

75th pct

59.0%▲ 2.0 pt

peer median 51.5% · #6 of 21 · 3,661 tested

Grade breakdown

Grade 3	59.0%	peer 56.0%	80th
Grade 4	63.0%	peer 53.0%	70th
Grade 5	57.0%	peer 46.5%	70th
Grade 6	49.0%	peer 47.0%	60th
Grade 7	60.0%	peer 50.0%	60th
Grade 8	35.0%	peer 50.5%	28th

45th pct

44.0%▲ 10.0 pt

peer median 45.5% · #12 of 21 · 595 tested

28th pct

37.0%▲ 14.0 pt

peer median 46.5% · #14 of 19 · 278 tested

High School & Regents

5th pct

83.5%▲ 0.5 pt

peer median 89.9% · #20 of 21 · 775 in cohort

Breakdown by cohort

4-Year	83.5%	peer 89.9%	5th
5-Year	85.8%	peer 91.0%	5th
6-Year	86.7%	peer 93.0%	10th
Combined	⚠	peer 90.7%	5th

Regents exams (11)

25th pct

80.0%▲ 3.0 pt

peer median 86.5% · #15 of 21 · 778 tested

10th pct

54.0%▼ 15.0 pt

peer median 66.0% · #18 of 21 · 1,046 tested

5th pct

30.0%▼ 33.0 pt

peer median 46.0% · #20 of 21 · 261 tested

25th pct

78.0%▼ 1.0 pt

peer median 83.5% · #15 of 21 · 861 tested

10th pct

75.0%

peer median 83.5% · #18 of 21 · 768 tested

25th pct

83.0%▲ 10.0 pt

peer median 88.0% · #16 of 21 · 416 tested

25th pct

58.0%

peer median 65.0% · #16 of 21 · 488 tested

30th pct

64.0%▼ 2.0 pt

peer median 71.5% · #15 of 21 · 346 tested

42nd pct

72.0%▼ 7.0 pt

peer median 75.0% · #12 of 20 · 111 tested

0th pct

15.0%▼ 47.0 pt

peer median 35.5% · #19 of 21 · 81 tested

21st pct

62.0%

peer median 72.0% · #12 of 15 · 724 tested

Growth & Readiness

75th pct

51.8

peer median 48.8 · #6 of 21

15th pct

148.2

peer median 161.7 · #18 of 21

Participation & English Learners

40th pct

84.2%▲ 10.1 pt

peer median 84.9% · #12 of 21

45th pct

83.8%▲ 9.5 pt

peer median 85.0% · #12 of 21

15th pct

98.5%▼ 0.2 pt

peer median 99.5% · #18 of 21

95th pct

63.0%▲ 9.0 pt

peer median 47.0% · #2 of 21 · 725 ELLs

37th pct

45.0%▲ 2.0 pt

peer median 48.0% · #12 of 20 · 203 ELLs

Accountability Performance

70th pct

146.2▲ 8.8

peer median 135.6 · #7 of 21

15th pct

151.9▲ 30.4

peer median 167.3 · #18 of 21

Climate

0th pct

26.0%▲ 0.5 pt

peer median 18.0% · #21 of 21

5th pct

37.2%▼ 5.3 pt

peer median 21.5% · #19 of 21

0th pct

184.1

peer median 200.3 · #21 of 21

10th pct

159.4

peer median 191.5 · #19 of 21

Staffing

60th pct

9.0%

peer median 12.5% · #4 of 21 · 73 of 831 teachers

90th pct

⚠

peer median 27.5% · #1 of 21

25th pct

⚠

peer median 1.0% · #8 of 21

Alternate & ELL Assessments (5)

69th pct

100.0%▲ 8.0 pt

peer median 88.5% · #1 of 17 · 11 tested

50th pct

82.0%▼ 18.0 pt

peer median 80.5% · #9 of 17 · 11 tested

56th pct

67.0%▼ 21.0 pt

peer median 56.5% · #7 of 17 · 12 tested

85th pct

24.0%▲ 6.0 pt

peer median 14.0% · #4 of 21 · 124 tested

63rd pct

27.0%▲ 4.0 pt

peer median 22.0% · #7 of 20 · 67 tested

Resources

80th pct

$33,909▲ $1,604

peer median $28,593 · #5 of 21

85th pct

$32,793▲ $2,144

peer median $27,093 · #4 of 21

40th pct

$1,116▼ $541

peer median $1,261 · #13 of 21

Accountability status

NYSED ESSA accountability — published on its own cycle (independent of the school year selected above).

Overall designation · 2024–25

Local Support and Improvement

Indicator levels · 2023–24 · 1 = lowest, 4 = highest

EM Chronic Absenteeism2

EM Core Performance3

EM ELP3

EM Weight Performance2

HS Chronic Absenteeism1

HS Core Performance2

HS ELP3

HS Grad Rate2

HS Weight Performance2

Progress to targets · 2024–25 (5)

Measure	Actual	State MIP	Long-term goal
Graduation Rate (4-Year)	83.5%	87.5%	88.8%
Weighted Performance — EM ELA	125.3	123.3	136.1
Weighted Performance — EM MATH	132.9	127.4	139.5
Weighted Performance — HS ELA	179.5	134.9	148.3
Weighted Performance — HS MATH	99.8	64.6	87.2

blue = met the State Measure of Interim Progress · amber = not yet met

By subgroup (17)

Level	Subgroup	Designation
EM	All Students	Local Support and Improvement
EM	Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander	Local Support and Improvement
EM	Black or African American	Local Support and Improvement
EM	Economically Disadvantaged	Local Support and Improvement
EM	English Language Learner	Local Support and Improvement: Potential Target District
EM	Hispanic or Latino	Local Support and Improvement
EM	Multiracial	Local Support and Improvement
EM	Students with Disabilities	Local Support and Improvement
EM	White	Local Support and Improvement
HS	All Students	Local Support and Improvement
HS	Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander	Local Support and Improvement
HS	Black or African American	Local Support and Improvement
HS	Economically Disadvantaged	Local Support and Improvement
HS	English Language Learner	Local Support and Improvement
HS	Hispanic or Latino	Local Support and Improvement
HS	Students with Disabilities	Local Support and Improvement
HS	White	Local Support and Improvement

Peers in this group

District	County	Pupils	ELA ↓	Math	Grad	Absent	$/Pupil
SHENENDEHOWA CSD	Saratoga	9,341	74.0%	82.0%	95.8%	11.5%	$21,675
WILLIAMSVILLE CSD	Erie	9,625	72.0%	79.0%	94.1%	13.4%	$21,744
WEBSTER CSD	Monroe	8,030	60.0%	68.0%	96.0%	13.6%	$26,653
WAPPINGERS CSD	Dutchess	10,332	59.0%	60.0%	91.1%	17.3%	$28,456
LEVITTOWN UFSD	Nassau	7,083	57.0%	73.0%	95.7%	14.3%	$33,111
NEW ROCHELLE CITY SD	Westchester	9,846	52.0%	59.0%	83.5%	26.0%	$33,909
WEST SENECA CSD	Erie	5,952	49.0%	55.0%	87.9%	17.9%	$24,418
WHITE PLAINS CITY SD	Westchester	6,781	49.0%	54.0%	92.3%	11.0%	$37,301
MONROE-WOODBURY CSD	Orange	6,374	48.0%	51.0%	90.1%	18.2%	$31,381
KENMORE-TONAWANDA UFSD	Erie	6,301	47.0%	51.0%	86.2%	18.4%	$26,654
LIVERPOOL CSD	Onondaga	6,641	47.0%	54.0%	85.5%	19.7%	$27,083
ARLINGTON CSD	Dutchess	7,644	45.0%	50.0%	90.6%	15.2%	$31,490
WILLIAM FLOYD UFSD	Suffolk	9,382	44.0%	45.4%	85.9%	25.1%	$28,729
PATCHOGUE-MEDFORD UFSD	Suffolk	7,597	43.0%	48.0%	87.0%	18.1%	$28,240
SACHEM CSD	Suffolk	11,588	43.0%	54.0%	93.2%	17.7%	$30,251
NORTH SYRACUSE CSD	Onondaga	7,705	42.0%	52.0%	85.9%	18.4%	$26,642
LONGWOOD CSD	Suffolk	8,790	39.0%	39.0%	87.4%	21.7%	$34,337
GREECE CSD	Monroe	9,934	37.0%	39.3%	88.8%	16.0%	$27,931
KINGSTON CITY SD	Ulster	5,977	37.0%	31.0%	80.4%	22.9%	$36,457
MIDDLE COUNTRY CSD	Suffolk	9,413	37.0%	40.4%	90.2%	22.2%	$28,795
HAVERSTRAW-STONY POINT CSD (NORTH RO	Rockland	7,972	35.0%	45.0%	89.8%	18.1%	$34,336

Schools in this district (10)

Your own buildings on the headline metrics — All Students · 2024–25. Click any column to sort, or a row to open its Report Card.

School	County	Pupils	ELA ↓	Math	Grad	Absent	$/Pupil
DANIEL WEBSTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL	Westchester	496	73.0%	79.0%	—	15.9%	$31,914
WILLIAM B WARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL	Westchester	1,019	64.0%	66.0%	—	17.9%	$31,041
GEORGE M DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL	Westchester	647	63.0%	66.0%	—	25.9%	$36,493
ALBERT LEONARD MIDDLE SCHOOL	Westchester	1,042	59.0%	65.0%	—	20.7%	$38,680
COLUMBUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL	Westchester	728	54.0%	54.0%	—	33.7%	$34,396
JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL	Westchester	517	40.0%	50.0%	—	31.9%	$39,110
ISAAC E YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL	Westchester	1,136	39.0%	52.0%	—	33.6%	$35,404
TRINITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL	Westchester	851	39.0%	48.0%	—	27.9%	$32,314
HENRY BARNARD SCHOOL	Westchester	460	—	—	—	29.6%	$36,934
NEW ROCHELLE HIGH SCHOOL	Westchester	3,058	—	—	86.6%	—	$31,563

NEW ROCHELLE CITY SD

Peer group

View

Trend over time — Graduation Rate (4-Year)

What changed

Special population gaps — Grad 4-yr

Gap vs. All Students over time — Grad 4-yr

Enrollment & demographics

Total enrollment

Race & ethnicity

Gender

Subgroups (share of enrollment)

Advanced coursework (AP/IB)

Most-taken exams

Report card vs. 20 peers

Grades 3–8

High School & Regents

Growth & Readiness

Participation & English Learners

Accountability Performance

Climate

Staffing

Resources

Accountability status

Peers in this group

Schools in this district (10)

Trend over time —