NEWBURGH CITY SD

districtOrange County10,870 pupils$32,148/pupil

☆ Save + Add to side-by-side 📊 Board presentation

Where it lands vs peers

70.6%13th percentile

· peer median 75.2%

ELA Math Grad Absent $/Pupil

70.6%

low 67.7%high 92.7%med 75.2%

this entity

peers

peer

middle 50% (IQR)

peer median

this district

Peer group

8 peers

Chosen by

Same N/RC, ±40% enrollment · 8 districts

Edit peer group →

Trend over time —

this entity

peer median

What changed

vs. 2023–24 · biggest movers

Regents Algebra I fell 17.0 pts to 34.0% (from 51.0%)
ELL Progress (Grades 3–8) fell 10.0 pts to 37.0% (from 47.0%)
NYSESLAT % Commanding (Grade 4) fell 10.0 pts to 8.0% (from 18.0%)
Regents Algebra II rose 9.0 pts to 60.0% (from 51.0%)

Special population gaps — Grad 4-yr

vs. All Students · 2024–25

Each subgroup against the All-Students value, widest gaps first. Blue ▲ favors the subgroup; amber ▼ is a gap to close. The last column shows the typical gap among your peer group.

Subgroup	Grad 4-yr	Gap vs All	vs. peer-typical gap
English Language Learner	41.9%	−28.7 pts	−14.1 pts · 14.6 pts wider than peers
Students with Disabilities	46.8%	−23.8 pts	−17.3 pts · 6.5 pts wider than peers
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander	92.9%	+22.3 pts	+10.8 pts · 11.5 pts wider than peers
White	84.4%	+13.8 pts	+0.8 pts · 13.0 pts wider than peers
Economically Disadvantaged	64.0%	−6.6 pts	−1.6 pts · 5.0 pts wider than peers
Multiracial	65.6%	−5.0 pts	−6.7 pts · 1.7 pts narrower than peers
Black or African American	67.3%	−3.3 pts	+1.2 pts · 2.1 pts wider than peers
Hispanic or Latino	67.3%	−3.3 pts	−1.6 pts · 1.7 pts wider than peers

Gap vs. All Students over time — Grad 4-yr

Each subgroup's gap vs. All Students, by year (points). Amber = the subgroup is behind · blue = ahead · grey = no data.

	2017–18	2018–19	2019–20	2020–21	2021–22	2022–23	2023–24	2024–25
English Language Learner	—	—	—	−33.3	−17.4	−15.8	−28.6	−28.7
Students with Disabilities	−29.7	−21.5	−27.1	−23.5	−28.1	−20.9	−17.2	−23.8
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander	+22.9	+13.6	+22.9	+20.2	+14.8	+16.1	+18.0	+22.3
White	+10.2	+5.6	+14.6	+9.4	+6.6	+13.5	+15.2	+13.8
Economically Disadvantaged	−6.6	−7.0	−8.8	−7.4	−8.3	−8.6	−7.4	−6.6
Multiracial	+1.1	−7.3	—	—	—	—	—	−5.0
Black or African American	−4.7	−2.0	−6.3	−0.4	−4.7	−5.9	−5.5	−3.3
Hispanic or Latino	−4.5	−1.8	−5.0	−3.7	−0.8	−3.2	−3.3	−3.3

amber = behind → blue = ahead · grey = no data no data

Enrollment & demographics

10,400 students · 2024–25

Total enrollment

10,69117

10,74518

10,73019

10,91320

10,63421

10,44422

10,49923

10,51624

10,40025

Race & ethnicity

Hispanic or Latino6,480 · 62.3%

Black or African American1,944 · 18.7%

White1,284 · 12.3%

Multiracial469 · 4.5%

Asian or Pacific Islander188 · 1.8%

American Indian or Alaska Native35 · 0.3%

Gender

Male5,355 · 51.5%

Female5,043 · 48.5%

Non-Binary⚠

Subgroups (share of enrollment)

Economically Disadvantaged5,432 · 52.2%

English Language Learners1,965 · 18.9%

Students with Disabilities1,831 · 17.6%

Advanced coursework (AP/IB)

2023–24 · latest available

AP/IB pass rate

30.1%

scored 3+ (AP) / 4+ (IB)

Exams per 100 students

7.7

all grades

Subjects taken

AP 813 · IB — exams

Most-taken exams

AP Language and Comp (AP) · 192 exams · 19.3% pass
AP Human Geography (AP) · 117 exams · 23.9% pass
AP World History (AP) · 112 exams · 43.8% pass
AP US History (AP) · 106 exams · 28.3% pass
AP U.S. Government and Politics (AP) · 85 exams · 37.6% pass

Report card vs. 8 peers

Subgroup: All Students · 2024–25

Grades 3–8

63rd pct

37.0%▲ 7.0 pt

peer median 34.0% · #4 of 9 · 4,251 tested

Grade breakdown

Grade 3	34.0%	peer 33.5%	50th
Grade 4	40.0%	peer 37.5%	63rd
Grade 5	48.0%	peer 40.5%	100th
Grade 6	31.0%	peer 32.5%	38th
Grade 7	35.0%	peer 27.5%	75th
Grade 8	36.0%	peer 31.0%	63rd

75th pct

38.0%▲ 2.0 pt

peer median 33.5% · #3 of 9 · 4,300 tested

Grade breakdown

Grade 3	39.0%	peer 38.5%	50th
Grade 4	42.0%	peer 37.5%	63rd
Grade 5	48.0%	peer 31.0%	100th
Grade 6	26.0%	peer 29.5%	25th
Grade 7	41.0%	peer 28.0%	75th
Grade 8	26.0%	peer 16.0%	75th

88th pct

34.0%▲ 5.0 pt

peer median 27.0% · #2 of 9 · 701 tested

88th pct

32.0%▲ 8.0 pt

peer median 26.0% · #1 of 9 · 640 tested

High School & Regents

13th pct

70.6%▼ 1.4 pt

peer median 75.2% · #7 of 9 · 942 in cohort

Breakdown by cohort

4-Year	70.6%	peer 75.2%	13th
5-Year	75.3%	peer 79.8%	13th
6-Year	81.8%	peer 84.3%	38th
Combined	⚠	peer 79.3%	25th

Regents exams (11)

50th pct

62.0%▲ 3.0 pt

peer median 62.5% · #5 of 9 · 924 tested

50th pct

34.0%▼ 17.0 pt

peer median 35.0% · #5 of 9 · 1,088 tested

75th pct

46.0%▼ 4.0 pt

peer median 34.5% · #3 of 9 · 1,025 tested

50th pct

64.0%▼ 3.0 pt

peer median 68.0% · #5 of 9 · 871 tested

38th pct

55.0%

peer median 70.0% · #6 of 9 · 782 tested

38th pct

60.0%▲ 9.0 pt

peer median 77.5% · #6 of 9 · 250 tested

25th pct

36.0%

peer median 43.5% · #7 of 9 · 357 tested

38th pct

46.0%▲ 1.0 pt

peer median 47.0% · #6 of 9 · 227 tested

0th pct

⚠

peer median 44.0% · #9 of 9

63rd pct

49.0%▼ 2.0 pt

peer median 22.0% · #4 of 9 · 552 tested

—

peer median 53.0% · n=7

Growth & Readiness

25th pct

46.7

peer median 47.8 · #7 of 9

88th pct

124.1

peer median 111.3 · #2 of 9

Participation & English Learners

25th pct

93.0%▼ 1.1 pt

peer median 96.2% · #7 of 9

38th pct

95.0%▲ 2.2 pt

peer median 95.6% · #6 of 9

88th pct

98.7%▲ 1.0 pt

peer median 97.9% · #2 of 9

0th pct

37.0%▼ 10.0 pt

peer median 44.5% · #9 of 9 · 1,076 ELLs

0th pct

32.0%▲ 6.0 pt

peer median 38.5% · #9 of 9 · 367 ELLs

Accountability Performance

75th pct

112.6▲ 11.7

peer median 106.9 · #3 of 9

50th pct

116.6▲ 23.7

peer median 118.7 · #5 of 9

Climate

75th pct

28.0%▲ 0.8 pt

peer median 32.3% · #3 of 9

88th pct

26.6%▲ 0.1 pt

peer median 48.0% · #2 of 9

75th pct

178.2

peer median 170.1 · #3 of 9

88th pct

184.4

peer median 134.5 · #2 of 9

Staffing

63rd pct

16.0%

peer median 21.5% · #4 of 9 · 146 of 919 teachers

0th pct

⚠

peer median 24.5% · #9 of 9

50th pct

4.0%▲ 3.0 pt

peer median 6.0% · #4 of 9 · 32 of 868 teachers

Alternate & ELL Assessments (5)

0th pct

⚠

peer median 84.5% · #9 of 9

0th pct

⚠

peer median 84.5% · #8 of 9

29th pct

⚠

peer median 64.0% · #6 of 8

13th pct

8.0%▼ 10.0 pt

peer median 13.5% · #8 of 9 · 159 tested

38th pct

12.0%▼ 1.0 pt

peer median 14.0% · #5 of 9 · 107 tested

Resources

50th pct

$32,148▼ $1,370

peer median $32,660 · #5 of 9

50th pct

$29,798▲ $1,008

peer median $29,554 · #5 of 9

13th pct

$2,350▼ $2,378

peer median $2,981 · #8 of 9

Accountability status

NYSED ESSA accountability — published on its own cycle (independent of the school year selected above).

Overall designation · 2024–25

Target District

Indicator levels · 2023–24 · 1 = lowest, 4 = highest

EM Chronic Absenteeism2

EM Core Performance2

EM ELP3

EM Weight Performance2

HS Chronic Absenteeism2

HS Core Performance1

HS ELP2

HS Grad Rate1

HS Weight Performance1

Progress to targets · 2024–25 (5)

Measure	Actual	State MIP	Long-term goal
Graduation Rate (4-Year)	70.6%	87.5%	88.8%
Weighted Performance — EM ELA	110.3	123.3	136.1
Weighted Performance — EM MATH	110.4	127.4	139.5
Weighted Performance — HS ELA	122.0	134.9	148.3
Weighted Performance — HS MATH	65.4	64.6	87.2

blue = met the State Measure of Interim Progress · amber = not yet met

By subgroup (18)

Level	Subgroup	Designation
EM	All Students	Comprehensive Support and Improvement
EM	Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander	Local Support and Improvement
EM	Black or African American	Additional Targeted Support and Improvement
EM	Economically Disadvantaged	Additional Targeted Support and Improvement
EM	English Language Learner	Additional Targeted Support and Improvement
EM	Hispanic or Latino	Additional Targeted Support and Improvement
EM	Multiracial	Additional Targeted Support and Improvement
EM	Students with Disabilities	Additional Targeted Support and Improvement
EM	White	Local Support and Improvement
HS	All Students	Comprehensive Support and Improvement
HS	Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander	Local Support and Improvement
HS	Black or African American	Targeted Support and Improvement
HS	Economically Disadvantaged	Targeted Support and Improvement
HS	English Language Learner	Local Support and Improvement
HS	Hispanic or Latino	Targeted Support and Improvement
HS	Multiracial	Local Support and Improvement
HS	Students with Disabilities	Targeted Support and Improvement
HS	White	Local Support and Improvement

Peers in this group

District	County	Pupils	ELA ↓	Math	Grad	Absent	$/Pupil
MT VERNON SCHOOL DISTRICT	Westchester	6,713	45.0%	41.0%	76.2%	22.1%	$36,619
UTICA CITY SD	Oneida	9,071	40.0%	43.0%	70.6%	34.7%	$26,934
ALBANY CITY SD	Albany	8,493	38.0%	35.0%	72.8%	29.1%	$31,346
NEWBURGH CITY SD	Orange	10,870	37.0%	38.0%	70.6%	28.0%	$32,148
MIDDLETOWN CITY SD	Orange	7,216	36.0%	33.0%	90.6%	25.9%	$35,709
CENTRAL ISLIP UFSD	Suffolk	7,769	32.0%	34.0%	77.4%	32.2%	$33,974
NIAGARA FALLS CITY SD	Niagara	6,826	31.0%	32.0%	81.4%	41.9%	$26,143
SCHENECTADY CITY SD	Schenectady	9,028	27.0%	22.0%	69.8%	41.5%	$30,798
EAST RAMAPO CSD (SPRING VALLEY)	Rockland	10,420	22.0%	18.2%	74.1%	32.3%	$35,257

Schools in this district (12)

Your own buildings on the headline metrics — All Students · 2024–25. Click any column to sort, or a row to open its Report Card.

School	County	Pupils	ELA ↓	Math	Grad	Absent	$/Pupil
FOSTERTOWN SCHOOL	Orange	593	48.0%	54.0%	—	23.1%	$31,624
MEADOW HILL SCHOOL	Orange	982	45.0%	49.0%	—	28.6%	$31,624
NEW WINDSOR SCHOOL	Orange	439	45.0%	61.0%	—	26.1%	$31,624
TEMPLE HILL SCHOOL	Orange	974	45.0%	35.0%	—	27.3%	$31,624
GARDNERTOWN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY	Orange	612	40.0%	42.0%	—	25.8%	$33,898
BALMVILLE SCHOOL	Orange	387	39.0%	27.0%	—	33.9%	$35,335
HORIZON-ON-THE-HUDSON SCHOOL	Orange	447	39.0%	31.0%	—	40.5%	$34,737
HERITAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL	Orange	856	36.0%	39.0%	—	18.0%	$31,624
VAILS GATE STEAM ACADEMY	Orange	500	34.0%	46.0%	—	32.0%	$31,624
GIDNEY AVENUE MEMORIAL SCHOOL	Orange	802	27.0%	31.0%	—	26.4%	$33,470
SOUTH MIDDLE SCHOOL	Orange	845	23.0%	18.3%	—	36.8%	$31,624
NEWBURGH FREE ACADEMY	Orange	3,547	—	—	72.0%	—	$31,624

NEWBURGH CITY SD

Peer group

View

Trend over time — Graduation Rate (4-Year)

What changed

Special population gaps — Grad 4-yr

Gap vs. All Students over time — Grad 4-yr

Enrollment & demographics

Total enrollment

Race & ethnicity

Gender

Subgroups (share of enrollment)

Advanced coursework (AP/IB)

Most-taken exams

Report card vs. 8 peers

Grades 3–8

High School & Regents

Growth & Readiness

Participation & English Learners

Accountability Performance

Climate

Staffing

Resources

Accountability status

Peers in this group

Schools in this district (12)

Trend over time —